Whether students have standing to challenge university speech regulations

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a student and student organizations investigated for possibly violating a_ public university’ regulations governing on-campus speech have standing to bring a_ First Amendment challenge to the vagueness and overbreadth of the regulations where the university declined either to clarify the regulations or disavow future enforcement? 2. Whether a public university's anti-harassment policy violates the First Amendment where it authorizes the university to restrict speech based on broad, vague, and undefined terms, and does not require that prohibited speech be objectively offensive? 3. Whether a public university violates the First Amendment when its campus speech regulations lack any process for screening insubstantial or frivolous complaints and its investigative procedures impose burdens on speakers, including a gag order, during pendency of the investigation? 4. Whether university officials are entitled to qualified immunity when they enforce university anti-discrimination policies by placing the burden on speakers to justify their engagement in controversial speech?