No. 18-7205
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-procedure-rule-60 due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment liberty liberty-interest property rule-60 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Whether Petitioner was deprived of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of . the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-23
Waiver of right of respondents State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper and Ahmed Rasul El-Amin to respond filed.
2018-12-26
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2019)
Attorneys
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper and Ahmed Rasul El-Amin
Joseph Finarelli — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent
Joseph Finarelli — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent