No. 18-7239
Daniel P. Cannon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender circuit-precedent due-process mandatory-sentencing mandatory-term post-booker sentencing seventh-circuit
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court GRANT this Writ because the decision of the Seventh Circuit violates Petitioner's Due Process Right, whereas sentencing occurred Post-Booker, but the career offender term was imposed mandatorily based upon controlling circuit precedent in effect at the time of Sentencing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ; 1) Should this Court GRANT this Write because the decision of the Seventh Circuit violates Petitioner’s Due Process Right, whereas sentencing occurred Post-Booker, but the career offender term was imposed mandatorily based upon controlling circuit precedent in effect at the time of Sentencing?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Daniel P. Cannon
Daniel P. Cannon — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent