No. 18-7270

Antonio Bryant v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-01-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel involuntary-confessions involuntary-statements people-v-bryant standard-of-proof sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Illinois Appellate Court's decision in People v. Bryant is contradictory to this Court's decisions in In re Winship, Jackson v. Denno, and Strickland v. Washington

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : —— Questons Presented . 1). Whether the Tlincis Appellate Court's decision in People Ve Bryant, AOL¥ TL App (1°") — L435 78-O, is contradictevy +othis Couvt's decision in in re Winship, 3947 OS. 35% (1970), pevtainin to! SUM ciency of the evidence. 5 2), Whether the Llinois Appellate Court's . decisién i People Vv. Bryant, 20LF Iu App C(**) A43578-U, ts contvadictory +O this Court's opinions . in Jackson v. Denno, 373 U.S. 36% (14 64) and Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 (1978), pertetning to thadmissa ble ,in volumtary custodtal statements. 3). Whether the Tllinots Appellate Court's ceciston People uv. Bryant, 2048 Tt App (1%) 143578-O, 75 contvadteto ry to this Cour fis held in Stricklandtu. Washinefon, 4GG US. GS (149), pertaining to inefhective ass istince of counsel.

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-29
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Antonio Bryant
Antonio Bryant — Petitioner
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent