| 25-6520 |
Steven George Morgan v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2026-01-08 |
Pending |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights fifth-amendment interrogation involuntary-statements miranda-rights police-deception |
1. Whether police deception that explicitly disavows the interrogative nature of
questioning—specifically, an officer's false promise that she is not … |
| 23-5656 |
Stephen M. Cooke, Jr. v. Allen Gang, Warden, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-09-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence fourteenth-amendment involuntary-statements post-indictment-statements right-to-counsel sixth-amendment undercover-agent |
Was Cooke's Sixth Amendment right to counsel violated? |
| 23A271 |
Atif Ahmad Rafay v. Eric Jackson |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-09-27 |
Presumed Complete |
|
AEDPA coerced-confession fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment involuntary-statements undercover-police-techniques |
Whether a state court violates the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act by applying a legal standard different from that required by the Fift… |
| 21-6967 |
Lemonta Markuis Maddox v. California |
California |
2022-01-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights coerced-confessions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-law interrogation involuntary-statements plea-bargaining state-law |
Whether the use of coerced statements obtained through false promises of leniency violates federal and state constitutional rights to due process |
| 21-6029 |
Daronnie Thompkins v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-10-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bank-robbery coercion criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency firearm-enhancement interrogation interrogation-tactics involuntary-statements self-incrimination sentencing |
Whether Thompkins' incriminating statements were involuntary and should have been suppressed |
| 21-5791 |
Cesar Santana v. Nelson Alves, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk |
First Circuit |
2021-09-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process fifth-amendment involuntary-statements miranda-warnings police-assurances police-interrogation self-incrimination |
Whether the Fifth Amendment is violated, and a defendant's statements are involuntary, when police assure a suspect that his statements will not be us… |
| 18-7270 |
Antonio Bryant v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-01-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel involuntary-confessions involuntary-statements people-v-bryant standard-of-proof sufficiency-of-evidence |
Whether the Illinois Appellate Court's decision in People v. Bryant is contradictory to this Court's decisions in In re Winship, Jackson v. Denno, and… |
| 18-7167 |
Cornelius Tyrone Kirsh v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
2018-12-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aggravated-flight burden-of-proof criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process habitual-offender insufficient-evidence involuntary-statements reasonable-doubt sufficiency-of-evidence |
Whether reasonable jurist would debate that the State failed to meet its burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Kirsh is guilt |
| 18-6975 |
Roy Arlen Van Nortrick v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
2018-12-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process duress duress-inducements-promises involuntary-statements judicial-error jury-instructions reasonable-doubt |
Whether reasonable jurist would debate that the State failed to meet its burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Van Nortrick is guilty |
| 18-6646 |
John Edward Davis v. Florida |
Florida |
2018-11-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
autopsy-photographs coercion constitutional-procedure criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel involuntary-confession involuntary-statements juvenile-offender juvenile-offender-rights juvenile-rights motion-to-suppress right-to-testify self-incrimination |
Whether the Florida Court of Appeals unreasonably applied this Court's precedent |