No. 21-6967
Lemonta Markuis Maddox v. California
IFP
Tags: civil-rights coerced-confessions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-law interrogation involuntary-statements plea-bargaining state-law
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the use of coerced statements obtained through false promises of leniency violates federal and state constitutional rights to due process
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : . ee, Ml for a PRESENTED My iP righty lowtul Tora detective to obtain . “puolucda Stoferents by werction ind promises: of leniency violating Seder and state Constitytonal riqats +0 Due Process.
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2022)