Whether the defendant's due process rights were violated when the government presented unreliable expert testimony and improperly influenced the jury

No question identified. : , sti i) 4% y ip oh ysically peeven evidence Laer a ie evidence showing pers anal net given Z LL My l ; Luket . defendant (see MiaraiDade County Elocichet state Court depasitia 2 bf. er | f 4; / f) | so_questian OF being to passession of thé aba defeadaat oxguing his case. prose The. 4rinl ood the anly proct agaist him is delendant The Lasited! Stator Mborney tate ad atl tal na al bal Scene ol the alleged crime “One agen? yas . ; € : Slates Mllecase called as a” expert witness the OS2 agent phatagcaphec ta testify ot Bee Letirtirone 2 aon * gn coxsld nat. 48 2 confuse mena ang ma pinletian ta the _ Yo id > pecsous Bet anly ane had vicler Showing nothin ar the « gat ar RLrL mere 3 tacts speak Sor ids salt the lac shoull | 7 on , Spittal Lias_ the —pucars. gualibied ja a no aa Gale of acan ck Peles case bonghi in at of , felting the jurors that. thes Cor. Dot. Le foun os a hung. pudcy Ldas. the gaverme rnd