| 23-7581 |
Glenn D. Odom, II v. Scott Jordan, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-05-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conflict-counsel conflict-of-counsel constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-rights due-process jury jury-questioning pro-se-defense waiver witness witness-testimony |
Does a criminal defendant have a constitutional right to fully present himself / herself as a witness |
| 22-7661 |
Michael D. Beiter, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-05-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-counsel constitutional-rights counsel-termination criminal-procedure discovery due-process fifth-amendment pro-se-defense sixth-amendment |
Whether a defendant who continually terminated (FIRED) his/her counsel ab initio of the proceedings and throughout the proceedings can gain access to … |
| 22-184 |
Christopher G. Parker v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-08-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
case-supplementation civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-procedure pro-se-defense right-to-counsel right-to-file-transcript right-to-supplement-record |
Whether the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals violated the Petitioner's rights |
| 18-7308 |
Ronnie Junior Rodriguez v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence expert-testimony expert-witness federal-agent jury-instructions photographic-evidence pro-se-defense prosecutorial-misconduct witness-testimony |
Whether the defendant's due process rights were violated when the government presented unreliable expert testimony and improperly influenced the jury |
| 18-6089 |
Marie Therese Assa'ad-Faltas v. City of Columbia, South Carolina |
South Carolina |
2018-09-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-expenses due-process equal-protection indigent-criminal-defendant indigent-defense pro-se pro-se-defense sovereign-immunity takings |
Whether South Carolina's Defense of Indigents Act denies equal protection between criminal defendants who choose to proceed pro se and those with stat… |