No. 22-184
Christopher G. Parker v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense
Response Waived
Tags: case-supplementation civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-procedure pro-se-defense right-to-counsel right-to-file-transcript right-to-supplement-record
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals violated the Petitioner's rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals violated the Petitioner's following rights: 1.) The Right to the Appointment of Counsel after proving: a.) The inability to afford Counsel b.) Merits of the case c.) Efforts to secure counsel : d.) Inability to present the case adequately without counsel 2.) The right to Due Process 3.) The right to Supplement the Record 4.) The right to file Transcript 5.) The right to have the case heard through the Appointment of Legal | Counsel . | |
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent Austin, Sec. of Defense to respond filed.
2021-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2022)
Attorneys
Austin, Sec. of Defense
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent