No. 18-7387
James Dennis Lenihan, III v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-924c 18-usc-924c3a carjacking crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-jurisdiction federal-offense force-clause statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal offense of carjacking, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2119, categorically qualifies as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)'s force clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the federal offense of carjacking, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2119, categorically qualifies as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)’s force clause? i
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2019)
Attorneys
James Lenihan
David Foster Ness — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
David Foster Ness — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent