No. 18-7462
William Anthony Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appeals-court-discretion appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-provisions court-discretion due-process finality finality-principle fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice judicial-discretion legal-finality mandate-recall miscarriage-of-justice recall-mandate statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appeals court abused its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to recall mandate
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE BASED ON ELEVATING THE PRINCIPLE OF FINALITY TO BE THE GUIDING FACTOR RATHER THAN CORRECTING A FUNDAMENTAL MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE?
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 15, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent