| 22-7860 |
Marijan Cvjeticanin v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2023-06-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence claim-preclusion constitutional-precedent due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-jurisdiction fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice issue-preclusion jurisdictional-challenge miscarriage-of-justice |
Did the Third Circuit violate the Constitution's Due Process Clause and this Court's established precedents |
| 22-6219 |
Bruce Wood v. Robert May, Warden, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-12-05 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability coa conflict-with-court-precedent due-process fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct rule-60 rule-60-motion |
When Petitioner's exculpatory evidence infers an innocent man is imprisoned |
| 22-5362 |
Agustin Garcia v. New Jersey |
New Jersey |
2022-08-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
6th-amendment complete-defense constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice post-conviction-relief right-to-counsel sixth-amendment technological-advances |
Whether the petitioner was deprived of the right to a fair trial and present a complete defense |
| 22-5281 |
Leonardo T. Morales v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Florida |
2022-08-04 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
constitutional-review due-process fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus res-judicata sentencing subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether the Florida Supreme Court had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus despite applying Res Judicata |
| 21-7173 |
Herman J. Snell, II v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2022-02-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
collateral-attack criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice fundamental-rights jurisdictional-challenge miscarriage-of-justice state-conviction subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Did the United States Supreme Court enter a new procedural rule of law that overrules subject matter jurisdiction? |
| 21-6552 |
Keith Carr v. Steve Kallis, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-12-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-u.s.c.-2241 due-process fifth-amendment fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus liberty-interest miscarriage-of-justice section-2241 section-851 sentencing-enhancement title-21-enhancement |
whether-an-unlawful-application-of-an-enhancement-pursuant-to-title-21-u.s.c.-851-amounts-to-a-fundamental-misscarriage-of-justice |
| 21-6242 |
Shelly Margaret Arndt v. Washington |
Washington |
2021-11-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-ruling factual-innocence fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus state-court unlawful-incarceration |
When a state court evidentiary ruling impinges on the constitutional rights of a factually innocent person, does the fundamental miscarriage of justic… |
| 21-6043 |
Vedrick Lamonte Symonette v. Florida |
Florida |
2021-10-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-v-maryland constitutional-violations criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-error fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice judicial-procedure jurisdiction miscarriage-of-justice vague-indistinct-indefinite |
Whether the information provided to the defendant was so vague, indistinct, and indefinite that it resulted in a due process violation, a Brady v. Mar… |
| 21-5403 |
Charles Edwin Tumlinson v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-08-17 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment 6th-amendment actual-innocence appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice pro-se-petition standing |
Should lower federal courts be allowed to violate Supreme Court case law and deny pro-se applicants relief for fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice clai… |
| 19-6995 |
Richard Alan King v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-12-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice magistrate pro-se-pleading procedural-default remand reversal standard-of-review standing supreme-court-precedent |
Was the presiding magistrate's analysis so flawed as to warrant this court to reverse and remand so that a correct legal standard may be applied? |
| 19-6441 |
In Re Sherman Alexander Lynch |
|
2019-10-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts actual-innocence brady-violation constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-default |
Whether the District Court erred when it held Lynch was not entitled to the 'fundamental miscarriage of justice' exception under the Carrier standard |
| 19-5305 |
Sherman Alexander Lynch v. Shane Nelson |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-v-maryland brady-violation civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process fraud-on-the-court fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus martinez-v-ryan procedural-default schlup-v-delo standing |
Whether the District Court erred when it held Lynch was not entitled to the 'fundamental miscarriage of justice' exception |
| 18-7462 |
William Anthony Johnson v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appeals-court-discretion appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-provisions court-discretion due-process finality finality-principle fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice judicial-discretion legal-finality mandate-recall miscarriage-of-justice recall-mandate statutory-provisions |
Whether the appeals court abused its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to recall mandate |
| 18-5070 |
Michael B. Williams v. Stephen Mayberg, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-02 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
actual-innocence brady-violation certificate-of-appealability dna-evidence exculpatory-evidence federal-habeas fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus mcquiggin-v-perkins procedural-default |
Whether petitioner's actual innocence claim overcomes the procedural default of his federal habeas claims challenging the constitutionality of his sta… |