No. 21-6242

Shelly Margaret Arndt v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2021-11-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-ruling factual-innocence fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice habeas-corpus state-court unlawful-incarceration
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2021-12-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a state court evidentiary ruling impinges on the constitutional rights of a factually innocent person, does the fundamental miscarriage of justice doctrine require this Court to protect the petitioner from unlawful incarceration?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED When a state court evidentiary ruling impinges on the constitutional rights of a factually innocent person, does the fundamental miscarriage of justice doctrine require this Court to protect the petitioner from unlawful incarceration? This case calls for Supreme Court review to prevent a fundamental miscarriage of justice to one who is factually innocent : especially when critical, relevant, reliable, and scientific evidence was wrongfully . excluded by the lower court evidentiary ruling. i

Docket Entries

2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent Washington to respond filed.
2021-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2021)

Attorneys

Shelly M. Arndt
Shelly Margaret Arndt — Petitioner
Washington
Peter Benjamin GonickAttorney General of Washington, Respondent