No. 18-7563
Lynce P. Foster v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance legal-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Punishment
FifthAmendment Punishment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether counsel were ineffective for not representing petitioner according to a counsel guaranteed to the petitioner by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : I. WHETHER COUNSEL WERE INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT REPRESENTING PETITIONER ACCORDING TO A COUNSEL GUARANTEED TO THE. PETITIGNER BY THE SIXTH. AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSEYTICGN:. CH ARGOEMENT ONE .
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent