No. 18-774
Anderson News, L.L.C., et al. v. American Media, Inc., et al.
Tags: antitrust antitrust-law boycott horizontal-agreement horizontal-boycott market-power per-se-rule price-increase sherman-act
Key Terms:
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a horizontal agreement to boycott a supplier can escape per se condemnation under Section 1 of the Sherman Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a horizontal agreement to boycott a supplier can escape per se condemnation under Section 1 of the Sherman Act based on the assertion that the conspirators organized the boycott in response to the supplier’s proposed price increase and not for the purpose of reducing competition in the supplier’s market.
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-06
Reply of petitioners Anderson News, L.L.C., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-02-19
Brief of respondents American Media, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2019-01-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 19, 2019, for all respondents.
2018-12-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 18, 2019 to February 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2019)
2018-10-05
Application (18A366) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until December 14, 2018.
2018-10-04
Application (18A366) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 17, 2018 to December 14, 2018, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
American Media, Inc., and Distribution Services, Inc.
David G. Keyko — Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Respondent
Anderson News, L.L.C., et al.
Curtis Circulation Company, et al.
George G. Gordon — Dechert LLP, Respondent