per-se-rule
13 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-1324 | SAP SE, et al. v. Teradata Corporation, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2025-06-30 | Denied | Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | antitrust-law per-se-rule rule-of-reason sherman-act software-products tying-arrangement | 1. Whether the rule of reason properly governs tying claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, concerning software products that are tec… |
| 23-1365 | United States v. Brent Brewbaker | Fourth Circuit | 2024-07-02 | Denied | antitrust antitrust-law bid-rigging horizontal-agreement per-se-rule sherman-act vertical-relationship | Whether the existence of a vertical relationship between the competing bidders precluded the application of the established per se rule against horizo… | |
| 23-1089 | Coronavirus Reporter, et al. v. Apple Inc. | Ninth Circuit | 2024-04-05 | Denied | Response Waived | antitrust antitrust-law civil-procedure civil-rights digital-distribution due-process free-speech market-definition monopoly-conduct per-se-rule software-tying standing | 1. Did the District Court err in denying leave to amend a first-to-file developer antitrust lawsuit concerning free digital apps, when Petitioner Dr. … |
| 23-6139 | Milton Dwayne Gobert v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | Fifth Circuit | 2023-11-30 | Denied | IFP | client-instructions habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel per-se-rule sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington substitution-of-counsel trial-counsel trial-strategy | 1. Does this Court's clearly established precedent under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and its progeny permit lower courts to hold th… |
| 23-562 | McDonald's USA, LLC, et al. v. Leinani Deslandes, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2023-11-27 | Denied | Amici (2) | antitrust antitrust-law cross-market-effects horizontal-component horizontal-restraints intrabrand-restraint market-competition per-se-rule rule-of-reason sherman-act | "The rule of reason is the accepted standard for testing whether a practice restrains trade in violation" of the Sherman Act. Leegin Creative Leather … |
| 21-852 | Christopher D. Lischewski v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2021-12-08 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | antitrust constitutional-principle criminal-antitrust criminal-procedure due-process jury-trial per-se-rule reasonable-doubt separation-of-powers sherman-act | The Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, prohibits any contract or combination "in restraint of trade or commerce." This Court has long held that Congress inte… |
| 20-6516 | Eric Dynell McGadney v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2020-12-03 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-review criminal-procedure eleventh-circuit judicial-discretion molina-martinez per-se-rule prejudice prejudicial-error sentencing-error sentencing-framework sentencing-guidelines | Whether a sentencing court's statement that it would have imposed the same sentence regardless of the Guidelines creates a per se rule that a miscalcu… |
| 19-322 | The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Atrium Health System, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2019-09-09 | Denied | Response Waived | antitrust antitrust-jurisprudence antitrust-law competitive-restraint competitive-restraints joint-venture joint-ventures per-se-rule per-se-violation procompetitive-rationale rule-of-reason sherman-act sherman-act-1 summary-judgment | When assessing the legality of competitive restraints imposed by joint ventures, this Court's antitrust jurisprudence recognizes that overly lax enfor… |
| 19-288 | Javier Sanchez, Gregory Casorso, and Michael Marr v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2019-09-04 | Denied | Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | antitrust antitrust-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment jury-instructions per-se-rule presumption sherman-act sixth-amendment | The question presented is whether the operation of the per se rule in criminal antitrust cases violates the constitutional prohibition —grounded in th… |
| 18A1342 | Javier Sanchez, Gregory Casorso and Michael Marr v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2019-06-19 | Presumed Complete | bid-rigging criminal-liability due-process jury-trial per-se-rule sherman-antitrust | Question not identified. | |
| 18-9044 | Troy Latrial Ramsey v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary | Ninth Circuit | 2019-04-30 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | certificate-of-appealability habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-standard miller-el-v-cockrell per-se-rule reasonable-jurist sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington | Whether the Ninth Circuit's ruling denying a certificate of appealability conflicts with this Court's ruling in Miller-El v. Cochrell, 537 U.S. 322, 3… |
| 18-774 | Anderson News, L.L.C., et al. v. American Media, Inc., et al. | Second Circuit | 2018-12-19 | Denied | antitrust antitrust-law boycott horizontal-agreement horizontal-boycott market-power per-se-rule price-increase sherman-act | Whether a horizontal agreement to boycott a supplier can escape per se condemnation under Section 1 of the Sherman Act based on the assertion that the… | |
| 18-5160 | Michael Anthony Tanzi v. Florida | Florida | 2018-07-09 | Denied | Relisted (5)IFP | caldwell-v-mississippi capital-punishment death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment harmless-error hurst-v-florida hurst-violation judicial-procedure per-se-rule supreme-court-precedent | 1. Does the Florida Supreme Court's application of a per se harmless–error rule to violations of Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), in every pre… |