Unlawful VERA Retirement Denial

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Unlawful VERA Retirement Denial 1. Whether Awarding VERAIVSIP to others in MDA, and even in my own office, and not awarding it to me, is okay or even legal? And whether using VERAIVSIP as a weapon to coerce me into dropping my legitimate EEO appeals is acceptable or even legal? And isn’t both of those actions discrimination and abuse of power? . . 2. Whether MDA can Unlawfully Use VERA/VSIP (Voluntary Early Retirement Authority/Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment) as a weapon to coerce . employees into dropping their legitimate EEO complaints? And isn’t it Extortion to offer to grant VERA/VSIP only if | drop my EEO/discrimination appeals? 3. Whether MSPB’s lack of quorum adversely affected their decisions in this VERAWVSIP case/appeal? And whether their lack of quorum is justification for assigning a biased admin judge with a unfavorable history with the Plaintiff? And whether their lack of quorum is the reason why the biased admin judge failed to recues herself? 4. Whether a government agency, specifically the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), can deny VERAIVSIP while awarding it to others? : ; ; 5. Whether it is a prohibited personnel practice for MDA to, on at least 7 occasions, used VERA/VSIP as a weapon to coerce me into dropping my legitimate discrimination appeals? : : 6. Whether the VERA/VSIP hearing was fair and unbiased and whether justice was served by it? 7. Whether Refusing to authorize VERA Retirement, CISSP Dues and Work-Related Training Reimbursement, while approving them for other employees at MDA (even ones in my own office), to force me to drop my MSPB and EEO complaints (which cost me and my family our health care when they knew my wife had cancer and | had an autistic son!), despite the fact that they authorized it for others in my office and MDA at large, was lawful or constitutes discrimination? [DeFacto Disparate Treatment and Discrimination] 8. Whether instituting a second investigation with their own people after the FBI cleared me of spying charges ("Nothing actionable, just another IT person bending a rule to get the job done.") adversely affected their VERA/VSIP decision? And whether using (misusing) their own people again (DoD IRD) to investigate their own agency (MDA) adversely affected their VERA/VSIP decision? 9. Whether MSPB made an even more egregious mistake when they denied VERAIVSIP to me and my family? [When CAFC directed them (MSPB) to reconsider VERA in their Aug 10, 2012 CAFC Decision Overturning MSPB VERA Retirement Decision, they didn't do it the way they should have done it. MDA . withheld vital evidence in their possession that would have resulted in a different . + fuling with an honest, objective and unbiased Admin Judge (The Admin Judge was _; biased and made her ruling too quickly, a couple of days after the hearing, almost as if it was predetermined and prewritten.)] . 2 of 40 4 “Equal Justice Under The Law’ 10.Whether you can use a Presidential Waiver to discriminate against black employees and managers and to deny VERAIVSIP and DOD Civilian Retiree ID . Card to black employees and managers? 11.Whether Disparate Treatment, Disparate Impact, Discrimination, Retaliation and Intentionaily Withholding Vital Information MDA they had in their possession was involved in the decision to deny me and my family VERA and VSIP? 12. Whether the admin judge was biased in her ultimate VERA/VSIP decision and the many decisions-leading up to it? 13.Whether MDA's perennial bad faith decisions and egregious actions (behavior) regarding this VERA/VSIP nullifies the decision or allows : justice to be served? 14.Whether MDA violated the 1967 Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) : when they denied me VERA/VSIP and my DOD Civilian Retiree ID Card when : they unlawfully terminated me given. was over 50, and when they replaced me with a much younger much less experienced white person? 15.Whether MDA’s actions contradicted VERA/VSIP. Standard Operating Procedures and Policies