No. 18-7877
Lester Roger Decker v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-performance constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was defendant's attorney's role to fulfill his advisory position to his client ineffective, thus violating client's right to Due Process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : ; Was defendant's attorney's role to fulfill his advisory position to his client ineffective, thus violating client's right to Due Process? oe
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent