No. 18-7887
Rodney Lyle Roberts v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 16th-amendment apportionment brushaber-case constitutional-basis constitutional-interpretation direct-income-tax direct-tax fifth-circuit-precedent income-tax parker-v-commissioner precedent sixteenth-amendment tax tax-law
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities LaborRelations
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit precedent in Parker v. Commissioner becomes unassailable in holding that the Sixteenth Amendment provided the needed constitutional basis for the imposition of a direct non-apportioned income tax
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Fifth Circuit precedent, in their ruling in Parker v. Commissioner, 724 F.2d 469 (1984), becomes unassailable in holding that the Supreme Court judged that the Sixteenth Amendment provided the needed constitutional basis for the imposition of a direct non-apportioned income tax, evén though called the proposition that the Sixteenth Amendment allows a : direct income tax without apportionment an "erroneous assumption?" . : y l
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent