No. 18-7925
Syed Nazim Ali v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
IFP
Tags: arbitration arbitration-immunity civil-rights corporate-representation due-process fair-hearing finra-arbitration immunity legal-standing pro-se-representation small-business small-corporation sole-owner
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether FINRA Arbitration process violated the Petitioner's rights of due process of law by failing to be fair and using the arbitration immunity to shield their actions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented ; ‘1. Whether FINRA Arbitration process violated the Petitioner’s rights of due process of law by failing to be fair and using the arbitration immunity to shield their actions. 2. Whether the Petitioner who is the sole owner Global which is a smail corporation should be allowed to represent the Corporation since all of the resources invested were from the Petitioner. 2
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2019)