Whether the state-created danger doctrine is clearly established law

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding that the state-created danger doctrine is not clearly established law and in failing to apply it, when there is a conflict between the United States Courts of Appeals on the applicability of this doctrine, and, if the Court of Appeals had applied this doctrine, its judgment would likely have been for the Petitioners. I. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that Respondent Officer Tyler Cook’s use of canine and deadly force against the decedent did not violate clearly established law for purposes of qualified immunity, when such decision conflicts with relevant decisions of the Supreme Court and other federal courts on the use of such force. ii LIST OF ALL PARTIES The caption of this Petition contains the names of all the