Whether the Due Process Standard of Jackson v. Virginia requires a court to consider all evidence, including evidence inconsistent with guilt, in deciding whether a reasonable juror could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Question Une : ny Cowal OF eecals euhnd Senleace buseaaihy loi nol addressed in ele Collbeeal order WAS Peocedueally Baceed exeoe. ovare, the Fedeeal Couel 09 heecale deetsisns in dootlel, and 1} 80, shat {4 Paver Aandaed oe louel it heveale in defererad to that sshich dows not ey tat under 2819.0, 420. 2254(A\ thn addecesind silent. Shabe court oping? Queabon io: . Does the Due P races Sindaed of daskenn vViedinw REQINIRE O count fy consider euldence. in decid ino uthethea a reasidahle Yntiaden could have Iound dull bevond a reasonible doubt, 0 this coust held in dachsae and the Us Sth, Hh, ctxeurls hau iheworex held ov may a conviction based cahaely on eurcumatachal cuidence be uitheld under hrcheon shy considerind onl te eurdenae eonaictent wth bu It and ibnoeing all other evidence aefuhot built 05 Teunth Geewt hell ints aac? Question Theee ; | Vos Couet OY Mercals cul lelislahwe decision toteeal aeeidruisin in Poeticulas, 03.0 element al he cRime Rather than 4enkencinl acho Biteed eondttubonal hinds on btisldrse Pouier fo define elements af offense crear, 0 18, Southltseeline Cade Ann. Sec. IL-i-SilLa) (2)execedols Consttubional lbs under Blakely Ve Uashrollan.Areesndh Ve New deoasey, ulhea court and not due toed Sentence, we does this count have a fead ston Hewabrnd Reeidwism as.an clement dhe relabed came?