No. 18-8312

Dayomashell David Aguilar v. William Gittere, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: aiding-and-abetting conspiracy criminal-procedure first-degree-murder jury-instructions mens-rea miscarriage-of-justice
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying a certificate of appealability on Aguilar's claim that the jury instructions relieved the State of the burden to prove the relevant mens rea element for aiding and abetting and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt and Aguilar could overcome any procedural bar due to a miscarriage of justice?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying a certificate of appealability on Aguilar’s claim that the jury instructions relieved the State of the burden to prove the relevant mens rea element for aiding and abetting and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt and Aguilar could overcome any procedural bar due to a miscarriage of justice? 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying a certificate of appealability on Aguilar’s claims that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel? i

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-20
Waiver of right of respondents William Gittere, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2019-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Dayomashell Aguilar
Jonathan Michael KirshbaumLaw Offices of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Jonathan Michael KirshbaumLaw Offices of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
William Gittere, Warden, et al.
Michael J. BongardOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Michael J. BongardOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent