No. 18-8320
Darius Andre Holmes v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: buford-v-united-states career-offender categorical-approach circuit-court-review criminal-history de-novo-review eleventh-circuit federal-enhancement predicate-offense serious-drug-offense taylor-v-united-states
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the circuit court departed from the established rule of Taylor v. United States, 495 US 575(1990), requiring a categorical approach to determine whether a prior state law conviction constitutes a predicate offense under a federal enhancement statute or guideline
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : ;
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Darius Andre Holmes
Darius Andre Holmes — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent