Whether the lower courts erred in violating Appellant's right to the free exercise of religion

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED « Dro THe Lowee Cawrs up dine VicLAre Nopabinn€ Rawr Tone Recs “Boa THe Lower. Dieteicr As Cecur Covers Lsrasnovatn] Miecovereues Npparast’s Bivass Type, Crm Kieu LaN6uT We Coner of Revienls Mister Bo Rave Aum Arrant Covrlictes Niscommucr oF THE Lower Cover BY Swmanaeivy Stepps NopeLlasr OF this Srsniog TO Sue” Deraamsr Ov THe Breas Crowes Thar He Pacsoosl Aesanous OF Cre Kier TWerepacaeve Hem Annas To Netto Moce TH ft “ GrevezaLizas Corevmsce We Sopeave Caer Lacomaeid, “Rabie wd “Bress V6, Six Uomasifias fexecal Ageurs, Jo 1.8. 286, M8. CF, 1994, Ad Les Id bd Was Tmipecpaas| Oveentes By THE Lower Covers’ \Wtoceny. Rpplicanos of Kee vs, Gaim, Stl F Bd 284,934 (Sere. do) Rom Lupas V5. Derevnens oF Wine Lire, Soy US.555, Sto-61 (Iaaa)The Coumar Quames VWzeuras Foe Keviad 15 Where, 02 moor THE Nppanaur'’s Rin To Tuc “Fectess Rap Niewsiotfol. Nrceee To THe fase Qoper Cas Be Sua Sous. Devied of Steppes Tey THe lower Quer’ Tipeemicerele hes Borcusas Faer-Runwas Tar A Covsriturionl Qanaa ERAS Te Nh Yee \GevEZALI ZED Geievasce “Dow Dp Appatasr $: * WeooeruL. Witeraaonee. RereLanas THwAer His Sanas 1983 Cun! Reag Clannge « *Taeisica Vicrimuzanoy Day Him Aes TM prenal. Pats Fae Casmeanoy? + * Liaw Apposres (hetamiur Agpowmes) Tones Aus “Boe ALias bares Couspi2e Te Nictare Appeliast's Cine es Cousrrurioual Rens ¢ > Lecmiy Versmisteoe. Wee this OFFice Vers he: Troito fp Notre he hs Alias fun Fozzie hopennen Tiree! Ad * DeMEAL Wirt Veeqnice Vnolate Brews Aue Cocsrmare A Fiene. Beece ©