| 24A576 |
Indiana Green Party, et al. v. Diego Morales, Indiana Secretary of State |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-12-12 |
Presumed Complete |
|
ballot-access election-law first-amendment fourteenth-amendment political-parties signature-requirements |
Whether Indiana's ballot access statutory scheme imposing substantial financial burdens on new political parties violates the First and Fourteenth Ame… |
| 22-893 |
Libertarian Party of New York, et al. v. New York State Board of Elections, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-03-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
anderson-burdick-test ballot-access election-law equal-protection first-amendment minor-parties political-parties signature-requirements |
Did the courts below properly apply the Anderson-Burdick standard? |
| 22-101 |
Martin Cowen, et al. v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-08-02 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
ballot-access congressional-district equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment signature-requirements third-party third-party-candidates |
Does a State violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments when its ballot-access restrictions on third-party candidates for United States Representativ… |
| 21-108 |
Clint A. Krislov, et al. v. Cook County Officers Electoral Board, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-07-27 |
Denied |
|
ballot-access civil-rights due-process first-amendment mootness mootness-exception public-interest public-interest-exception signature-requirements |
Whether federal courts recognize a public interest exception to mootness |
| 19-524 |
Roque De La Fuente, aka Rocky v. Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-22 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
anderson-burdick anderson-burdick-framework ballot-access ballot-clutter constitutional-review election-law independent-candidates presidential-election presidential-elections signature-requirements voter-confusion |
When evidence is adduced that signature collection requirements to secure ballot access for independent presidential candidates exceed what is necessa… |
| 18-8335 |
Lamar C. Chapman, III v. Barack Hussein Obama |
District of Columbia |
2019-03-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ballot-access civil-procedure civil-rights congressional-districts due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech religious-freedom signature-requirements standing takings voting-rights |
Whether the lower courts erred in violating Appellant's right to the free exercise of religion |