Is there arguable merit to the claim that Respondents engaged in an unlawful antitrust-conspiracy, racketeering-conspiracy, trademark-property, business

QUESTIONS PRESENTED First, Is there arguable merit to the claim that Respondents engaged in an unlawful . antitrust and/or racketeering conspiracy, intending by a pattern of frauds to obtain Petitioner’s registered trademark property and damage the Petitioner’s business? Second, . Under the circumstances, have the courts erred in failing to request counsel to represent the Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); or, shall this Supreme Court, pursuant to this Court’s inherent authority in equity, now appoint counsel for the Petitioner? 1