Did the Ninth Circuit err by finding that there was no 'egregious violation' of Mr. Wright's Fourth Amendment rights when Mr. Wright's cellular phone was subjected to warrantless tracking for twenty-four (24)-hours a day, for over twenty-one (21) days in time?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Ninth Circuit err by finding that there was no “egregious violation” of Mr. Wright’s Fourth Amendment rights when Mr. Wright’s cellular phone, without a related supervised release condition, was subjected to warrantless tracking for twenty-four (24)-hours a day, for over twenty-one (21) days in time? 2. Did the Ninth Circuit err by finding that Mr. Wright’s supervised release conditions as to criminal activity and associating with persons “engaged in criminal activity” were not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad, or denied Mr. Wright his Constitutional due process? 3. Did the Ninth Circuit err by finding there was not a Tapia error in the district court sentencing Mr. Wright to three (3) years of supervised release in large part for a need for rehabilitation? i