John James Bell v. South Carolina
1-ID PETTIONER RECEIVE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW ACCORDING TO THE"DUE PROCESS"ELEMENT OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
2-DID PETITIONER RECEIVE ADEQUATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION DURING THE AUGUST 27TH, 2014 NA HEARING?.
3-DID PETITIONER RECEIVE A FAIR HEARING WHEN DELIBERATE OMISSIONS OF HOW TESTING WAS CONDUCTED CONTTRADICTED THE FBI MANVEL FOR TEST REQUIREMENTS [LISTING SEVENI?
4-DID PETITIONER RECEIVE A FAIR HEARING ON AUGUST 2ITH, ZOIA WHEN SAID FBI REPORT ON HOW TO TEST DNA WAS WITHHELD BY ATTORNEY ASSIGNED TO REPRESENT HIM?
5-ID PETITIONER RECEIVE A FAIR HEARING WHEN AVAILABLE WITNESSES WERE NOT CALLED TO TESTIFY ON WHAT WAS AND WASN'T DONE REGARDING SPEEDY TRIAL HEARING MAY 4TH, 1992?
-DI PETITIONER SUFFER DELIBERATE INDIAERENCE WHEN ANA HEARING WAS ILL-PREPATED THRDUGH WITHHOUDIN INSORMATION PRESENTED BY PETITION TO ATTORNEY ASSIGNED TO RETRESENT HIM [OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE].
T-PETITIONER MADE EVERY POSSIBLE ESFORT TO SECUICE AFAIR TRIAL BUT ND INVESTIGATION WAS PROPERLY ADMINISTERED BY COUNSEL LEAVING PETITIONER ARGUING AGAINST THE STATES DNA RESULTS. BECAUSE PRDOF OF ONLY BLOOD TUPE COUUD BE DETERMINED: HOW DID ANA EVOLVE FROM "DEGRADED BLOOD"ON CLOTHES ARRESTED IN?
B-WAS HOW CLOTHING WAS CONFISCATED FOR DNSA TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO LAW [OF PROPER "SEARCH WATORANT"I?*-SEE TRIAL TRAKS. P. 57*
9-DID PETITIONER RECEIVE HAS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTF AS DESRIBED INS THE FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH , EIGHTH ANA FOURTEENTH
Did the petitioner receive equal protection of the law under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?