Did the petitioner receive equal protection of the law under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I-Din PETTIONER RECEWE EQUAL PROTECTION of He LAW) ACCORBING Td THE. ‘ NDE PROCESS Element of THE Fourteen Amendment of He United Srates ConsremTion® 2-hin PETITIONER RECEWE ANEOWATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION Deine THe Aveust 27H, 204 NNA Hearn. 3-Lib PETITIONER RECeWe A Fain Hearinie HEN DELIBERATE OMISSIONS CF How TESTING WAS CONDUCTED CONTRADICTED THE FRI mawver for Test REOvVIREMENTS LLisTins seven? 4-Did PETITIONER RECEWE A Four HEARING os Aveust 291, Z014wHEN srib FBI KePort on How Test DNA was, vorTHteLs BY AWORNEY ASSIGNED TO REPRESENT |im? 5-Aid PETITIONER Receive A FAIR Hearne wren) AVAILABLE. WITNESSES WERE NOT CAWED TO TESTILY on) WHAT WAS ANA WASN'T DONE REGARDING SPeen4 TRIAL HEARING MAY 4m, (9927 G-Sid PETITIONER. SUPER DELIBERATE INDIERENCE wien INA HeaRINs WAS ILL-PREPATED TARDUGH UOITHHOUMN insfoRMATIDN PRESENTED BY PETITION Th ATTORNEY ASSIEWED TD KEPRESONT Him CopstRvcnion of Justice]. TPETITIONER MADE EVERY PossiBLe efor Tm secure AP WRTRIAL BUT ND INVESTIGATION WAS PROTERLY ADMINISTERED BY COUNSEL LEAVING PETITIONER ARGUING AGAINST THE STATES DNA Resour. Because prook of ont @dood TPE CouLd BE RETERMINEN : HOw Did ANA Evole Som“ DEGRADED BUtvb’on cooTHles ARRESTED IN? B-WAS How CLOTHING WAS CoNFiscATEA FoR. MGA TESTS NE ACCORDING TD LAw [oF prover * SEARCH UWATORANT]24eSEE TRIAL TRAKS, B'S 4Sus Petitioner recewe Has CopsTeTUTIONAL Kiet AS DESRIBED nS THE FORTH ,FiPrHt SIXTH ,G1GHTH ANA PouRTEENTH AMENDMENTS of THE Drrten States Coosnrinon 2