No. 18-8830
Julio Cesar De La Rosa v. United States
Tags: criminal-law due-process firearms mens-rea misdemeanor-crime-of-violence physical-force statutory-interpretation voisine-v-united-states
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether recklessness is consistent with the 'use of physical force'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether this Court’s holding in Voisine v. United States, __U.S..__,136 S.Ct. 2272 (2016), that recklessness is consistent with the “use of physical force” extends beyond the definition of “misdemeanor crime of violence” at issue in that case? ii PARTIES Julio Cesar De La Rosa is the Petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent; it was the plaintiffappellee below. iii
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Julio Cesar De La Rosa
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent