No. 18-8931
Tajie Coleman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split criminal-law due-process elements-clause new-york-state-law physical-force robbery statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the New York State offense of robbery satisfies the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the New York State offense of robbery “has, as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another,” as required to satisfy the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. §92.4(e)(2)(B)(i), a question that divides the circuits. i
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Tajie Coleman
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent