1. Whether McCoy applies when a defendant's attorneys concede, against his wishes, his guilt to a lesser-included offense during final argument, and is a timely and express statement of his wishes to present an innocence defense sufficient to invoke McCoy?

2. Assuming, arguendo, that McCoy announces a "new rule" within the meaning of Teague, and also assuming, arguendo, that the TCCA's application of Teague is an adequate and independent state bar to preclude federal review of the merits of a claim, does the "new rule" this Court announced in McCoy constitute a "watershed rule of criminal procedure," such that it satisfies the second exception to Teague, which generally bars retroactive applications of new rules of criminal procedure to cases on collateral review?

Whether McCoy applies when a defendant's attorneys concede, against his wishes, his guilt to a lesser-included offense during final argument, and is a timely and express statement of his wishes to present an innocence defense sufficient to invoke McCoy?