| 20-7945 |
Troy Arnaud v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Louisiana |
2021-05-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure fourteenth-amendment non-unanimous-jury ramos-retroactivity ramos-v-louisiana retroactivity sixth-amendment teague-framework teague-v-lane watershed-rule |
Whether Ramos v. Louisiana applies to cases on State collateral review |
| 20-7864 |
James E. Mason, Jr. v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
2021-04-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure fourteenth-amendment non-unanimous-jury ramos-retroactivity retroactivity sixth-amendment teague-framework teague-v-lane watershed-rule |
Whether Ramos v. Louisiana applies to cases on state collateral review |
| 19-6949 |
James R. Royal v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Virginia |
2019-12-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
collateral-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process mccoy-v-louisiana retroactivity sixth-amendment watershed-rule |
Is McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S.Ct.1500(2018) a watershed rule of criminal procedure which must be applied retroactively on collateral review? |
| 18-9546 |
Everett Charles Wills, II v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-06-04 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
collateral-review criminal-justice criminal-procedure danforth-v-minnesota federal-law greene-v-fisher mccoy-v-louisiana montgomery-v-louisiana post-conviction-proceedings postconviction-review retroactive-application retroactivity retroactivity-of-new-rules teague-rule teague-v-lane watershed-rule |
Whether States must apply a 'watershed rule' under Teague v. Lane in post-conviction proceedings |
| 18-8970 |
John William King v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-04-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-punishment criminal-procedure death-penalty habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lesser-included-offense mccoy-v-louisiana retroactivity sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right-to-counsel teague-analysis teague-v-lane watershed-rule |
Whether McCoy applies when a defendant's attorneys concede, against his wishes, his guilt to a lesser-included offense during final argument, and is a… |
| 18-7860 |
Timothy L. Barnes v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2019-02-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
collateral-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment jury-finding mandatory-minimum retroactivity sixth-amendment substantive-rule watershed-rule |
Does the Alleyne rule apply retroactively on collateral review? |
| 18-1016 |
Lloyd Gene Beam v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2019-02-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
collateral-review criminal-procedure due-process federal-constitution judicial-impartiality judicial-impartiality-standard-retroactivity montgomery-v-louisiana retroactive-application state-collateral-review teague-retroactivity teague-v-lane watershed-rule watershed-rules |
Was the new standard from People v. Stevens a decision by the Michigan Supreme Court interpreting the federal Constitution? |
| 18-7725 |
Ralph Francis DeLeo v. Francisco J. Quintana, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-01 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
collateral-review due-process judicial-proceeding luis-v-united-states new-watershed-rule powell-v-alabama retroactivity right-to-counsel sixth-amendment supreme-court-rule-10 watershed-rule |
Should this Court exercise its supervisory power under Supreme Court Rule 10 and grant review of petitioner's case? |
| 18-7210 |
Gordon Prailow v. Maryland |
Maryland |
2019-01-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
automatic-reversal collateral-review constitutional-deficiency criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus jury-instructions jury-verdict reasonable-doubt retroactivity sixth-amendment watershed-rule |
Whether state collateral review courts must retroactively apply the watershed/bedrock procedural rule of automatic reversal to jury findings that are … |