No. 18-9546

Everett Charles Wills, II v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: collateral-review criminal-justice criminal-procedure danforth-v-minnesota federal-law greene-v-fisher mccoy-v-louisiana montgomery-v-louisiana post-conviction-proceedings postconviction-review retroactive-application retroactivity retroactivity-of-new-rules teague-rule teague-v-lane watershed-rule
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-03-06 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether States must apply a 'watershed rule' under Teague v. Lane in post-conviction proceedings

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether, as the Court has thrice asked but never answered, States must apply a “watershed rule” under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989) in postconviction proceedings?! (2) Whether the rule of McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018), which bars defense counsel from conceding guilt over a client's objection, is retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review as a “watershed rule” under the framework of Teague? 1 Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718, 729 (2016); Greene v. Fisher, 565 U.S. 34,41 n* (2011); Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264, 277-78 (2008). i

Docket Entries

2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
Reply of petitioner Everett Charles Wills, II filed. (Distributed)
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-03
Brief of respondent Vannoy, Warden in opposition filed.
2020-01-13
Motion for leave to file an amended petition for a writ of certiorari DENIED.
2019-12-11
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 3, 2020.
2019-12-03
Reply to response to motion for leave to file an amended petition for a writ of certiorari from petitioner filed.
2019-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 5, 2019 to February 3, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-27
Response to motion for leave to file an amended petition for a writ of certiorari from respondent filed.
2019-11-22
Motion for leave to file an amended petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner.
2019-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 5, 2019.
2019-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2019 to January 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-19
Response Requested. (Due October 21, 2019)
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2019-05-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Everett Charles Wills, II
Seth P. WaxmanWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner
Seth P. WaxmanWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner
Everett Charles Wills II — Petitioner
Everett Charles Wills II — Petitioner
Vannoy, Warden
Elizabeth Baker MurrillOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker MurrillOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent