No. 18-9018

Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr. v. City of Chesapeake, Virginia

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: age-discrimination age-retaliation certiorari-review circuit-court-conflict civil-rights fraud fraud-allegations fraud-on-the-record judicial-discretion race-discrimination race-retaliation retaliation
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2019-12-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Supreme Court can affirm the Fourth Circuit's certification of the consolidated case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1). Whether the United States Supreme Court with its judicial discretion is able to affirm the Fourth Circuit’s Certification of this consolidated case(“No.: 18-1462”) after the United States Supreme Court has acquired sufficient knowledge of Fraud(and/or Error as related to Fraud) on . the Record of the Courts as clearly explained and shown by the Appellant’s Reasons for Granting the Writ? . 2). Whether the United States Supreme Court with its judicial discretion is able to grant Certiorari based on Appellant’s assertions of the United States court of appeals’ affirmation of the District Court’s “Judgment in Civil Case(Doc. # 66, of consolidated case number 2:16-cv-00301), Opinion and Order(Doc. # 65), and Order(Doc 64),” of which is in conflict with the decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important matters(race and age discrimination and race and age retaliation)? 3). Whether within this appeal of this consolidated case(“No.: 18-1462”) of which is not an appeal of right can the United States Supreme Court with its judicial discretion be able to determine that Appellant as it appears was assisted by the Court ill-judicially while causing to be subliminally subjected to Appellee’s subjective defense that was camouflaged “as a scheme to interfere with the judicial machinery performing the task of impartial adjudication, as by : preventing the opposing party(Appellant) from fairly presenting Appellant’s case or defense,” thus also inducing affirmation of the District Court’s decision affirmed by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to be in conflict with a decision of another United States court of appeals on : the same important matters(race and age discrimination and race and age retaliation)? (i)

Docket Entries

2019-12-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-10-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-26
Application (18A1100) to file petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of page limits granted by The Chief Justice. The petition for a writ of certiorari may not exceed 57 pages.
2019-03-21
Application (18A1100) to file petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of page limits, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2019-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 29, 2019)
2019-03-11
Application (18A717) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 22, 2019.
2019-03-04
Application (18A717) to extend further the time from March 7, 2019 to March 22, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2019-01-11
Application (18A717) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 7, 2019.
2019-01-07
Application (18A717) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 21, 2019 to March 7, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Jupiter Dennell Wilson
Jupiter Dennell Wilson Sr. — Petitioner
Jupiter Dennell Wilson Sr. — Petitioner