Whether the trial court erred in denying petitioner's rights as a disabled individual, including his right to reasonable accommodations and equal access to the courtroom

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; O Perritowe/2 OuUE Stow THE TREAL Cavets Feline Coveetaving Pos618&, PaepeRé OF Pelsouets SHS ac p QuelNied WOVIINE And HS Liyths bo WE Handicngd SabHUE DEVILEr Ae mabilibey, ® Ebbw Queshone THE TEAL Coucks DEUSionJ fo Being Pebitomed, Zale Couek tam Placed Him In A Chai Ayd mob Alay Js domlonnoe re Be, OB SteUED by He Tene of Kacd, ® PelLonsese Quesfayyc THe Thi Conets A low nia wowed oKFreee TO Kemens TA CovetReom 2) wheelehrade, Whéee oFFiter covil Stand ye Aud Sith, Mow eve, Pelihoned cov ast 8 hand) p and Press mtéd sehcee Sreod ye But Pediboverd Dad vot Tieenbirg Mrs wosé ak the. court, RELL And) way, Ceeoting Byes and Pagvaee Towhed Rehibweée, O Perrine dueshine nvonssce le Tar His Aor, Hendivape LisveS SHol He Netked Msstetrons BY THE TRA Covet pvt Stad€, REE vord Of Facto nee Hey AsS-ASSeSsed By He trades very eat, : Kondicugs as mo Lebylbel oe pm reaching Expeurdwilneases Were freservked, On He Belt Z And Br TAR Remual. of Gis Essves Fite Sie of tte ce His Lie Due ts Tied Lesson And Whanrabeli ty Fo Mened Tues er), @ Pebilroner Qutstrons That bis PEPE EE unde, wauldnh PAsue Contr po tidy ty Sites Mes Pleas of SEIF Delerge. Ord RV snore, AL THE On St; Peead Thy peesued Aad eae Oar Avo Failed, Onley Th They fooh ue pebbwnes SIP Neknte purds wie Lees Eaprth wilmesses needed to evfotter p. Kbwret micvaalicd oF EVENTS AQVERSAR IY to THE SIyede LOAM, Pebilr eatrinnes tL fbrd TS ANT ICPSR, bas hathy Pleaded Hm Gud Vth WS wishes, 02 6h @ ®O falitioner QUESHbale THE validity ofHe pypcllsd awl& Op Moars Neliecod BY T4sIek SzHeshote M5 Sv Hociente ofthat bauk H Ad We ee He cored Clemaly THE Tedge And Court DD no Lewo ay of dh han dense pike 2 Buiderce Bofotz Powis vey tts CPIM, Pe hoee Queshons whedler THER Spotemendy as Meda cwsé bite Kdietl thiseandied fy Ber, Blaheathy bite, o —-D_Pebvireute Queshons hetler @ delet Court Tudye. can) oubeglie Meset~ FAlsé Hood on He Paced Zu Pehehiny doo Geneke ervearkas Jey 4 He Pe vetnsiogsevths Futlunhans He coves ze) And Het, prkenet, -3| | Questtonk) Preserve PAGE Two PErrrcewer. QVESITane wheltee Aceusething of consis tothe Fe leone OR EK aqqetohinng MB Ames “ As THE. ShobemivL mn ¢bsehi— ts Puc Pe fet te He make tN Thea oe States THE Pebidoomnege Kees Ai\mewes, Meccver, He cavnot Be. Accused of Some Tiing A ARES B Ce sets He Has ore caw Me? Ayn “cad cs Be VSE® AS SIAVOER To tmpend IAs necect to Me Fwoeeok feck, G) Pebivivser Qusheus thee appellate Defense Counset ta Pebidances NOME as Dehndent cereale a Pecvle4ve WazrBLLe Atos bec p>weet, Tssues with re Fremel Techie, Teens tng w dle Feo Bus ly bdo Readong tre Wawseiaks of HR Spofes marettre, of Mew Pe Pededly TOOK Plone, CUAMER) QseStereg TOE Madseeywe Fact-of wher left Fiery, THE ASS®éM on) Came Freon, Whe a Real Knpect. GEE peen 38 Appellate. opinims), Ando Mmeeely Covel sovey BY Bott Asetreg, CD) Retr tioweR Questiras whetee Ferfdvee, 608, mniscondvet— find VioledrorY OF Poe Phas s Re has of He Uri eo StetES Consh dvtron By ese Qutsh ons Aden He Gveshrws Feira 78 these, Ps Peenuaap By Hey WHS Pelitiond op4e2 pews Pebhbns, omplanhs ard Appeals And . Tr Conpodstes Hem ail gs Questons TD Tes Honore cowed Fo Meche. , @ PeAironer Questions whelher Fheprdne2, BOS tnd IS cowdied_ac m Kesuleof Foran rash AVO FavcFiond Dve + A Decumalted mehuat,_ vssue o& . B2L Documented as Existing AND Ve@y REAL . Pebtrenee Questions whebbee Dscammeting of Eaual operetta Pecauze. of Seantl Economie Deprnvitrad Av) EARS Cron (aR used TS witht D, poss/Ble, rvedipatory Exeyporseg oe Ee coding Alene ; ont Cle wa peadiing oe plese Bal Kreg serene T Hag dé. My Fess lBa Sow vob Themen word Aitintk Bunnceveé, = 3 A. TST OFPARTIES =—SOC*~“<‘“~*S*“<CS fj All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. . : -. [] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of ; all