No. 18-9238

Reshaud Todd Brown v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2019-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment habitual-offender habitual-offender-statute life-without-parole mandatory-sentencing proportionality-review sentencing sentencing-court youthful-adult youthful-offender
Key Terms:
Punishment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether imposition of a mandatory sentence of life without parole under a habitual offender statute violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, where petitioner committed prior 'strike' offenses when he was a youthful adult (21-22 years old) but the sentencing court did not take youth into account in imposing the sentence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether imposition of a mandatory sentence of life without parole under a habitual offender statute violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, where petitioner committed prior "strike" offenses when he was a youthful adult (21-22 years old) but the sentencing court did not take youth into account in imposing the sentence? -i

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Reshaud Brown
David Bruce KochNielsen, Broman & Koch, Petitioner
David Bruce KochNielsen, Broman & Koch, Petitioner