No. 18-9250

Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 13th-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eighth-amendment employment employment-retaliation involuntary-servitude retaliation thirteenth-amendment
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Shall the Court of Appeals expedite an Appeal in an employment retaliation case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions presented: 1) Shall the Court of Appeals expedite an Appeal in an employment retaliation case if the Plaintiff is suffering for many years (over five and a half years) from irreparable harm due to the lost earnings and damaged reputation as a result of being unlawfully terminated from the job? 2) Shall the Court of Appeals expedite an Appeal in an employment retaliation case if the fired Plaintiff can’t get a job in his/her professional field, and the employee is forced to be a slave and to do involuntary servitude which is against the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? 3) Shall the Court of Appeals expedite an Appeal in an employment retaliation case if the fired Plaintiff is suffering for many years (over five and a half years) from the cruel and unusual punishment which is a result of retaliation and unlawful termination and which is against the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? 4) Shall the Court of Appeals expedite an Appeal if the Plaintiff is a 52 yo woman who notifies the Court that she needs to undergo medical treatment such as the In-Vitro Fertilization procedure? Page 2 of 23 Il. A list of all Parties in the proceeding in the Court whose judgment is sought to be reviewed. 1) Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva — Plaintiff/Appellant Petitioner Pro Se. I was a Plaintiff at the District Court of Northern California and an Appellant at the Court of Appeals for the 9" Circuit. Tatyana E. Drevaleva 1063 Gilman Dr., Daly City, CA, 94015 415-806-9864; tdrevaleva@ gmail.com ; 2) Alameda Health System (AHS) — Defendant/Appellee Respondent. AHS was a Defendant at the District Court of Northern California and a Appellee at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9" Circuit. AHS was represented by the Narayan Travelstead Professional Law Corporation. Mr. Timothy C. Travelstead, Esq. Ms. Julie L. Cho, Esq. 24301 Southland Dr., Suite 607, Hayward, CA 94545 Telephone: (650) 403-0150 Facsimile: (650) 403-0157 t.travelstead Page 3 of 23 3) Officers of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Ms. Catherine Daly, Ms. Joan Healy, Mr. Bobit Santos, and Mr. Eric Rood in their individual capacities — Respondents. They were Defendants at the District Court for Northern California and Appellees at the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Ms. Doris Ng, Esq., STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Industrial Relations Division of Labor Standards Enforcement 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94102 , Tel.: (510) 285-1634 Fax: (415) 703-4807 _ dng @dir.ca.gov Page 4 of 23 Ill.

Docket Entries

2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-21
Waiver of right of respondents Catherine Daly, Bobbit Santos, Joan Healy, Eric Rood & Department of Industrial Relations to respond filed.
2019-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent Alameda Health System to respond filed.
2019-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Alameda Health System
Timothy C. TravelsteadNarayan Travelstead, P.C., Respondent
Timothy C. TravelsteadNarayan Travelstead, P.C., Respondent
Catherine Daly, Bobbit Santos, Joan Healy, Eric Rood & Department of Industrial Relations
Doris NgDivision of Labor Standards Enforcement, Respondent
Doris NgDivision of Labor Standards Enforcement, Respondent
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva
Tatyana E. Drevaleva — Petitioner
Tatyana E. Drevaleva — Petitioner