No. 18-926

Putnam Investments, LLC, et al. v. John Brotherston, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
CVSGAmici (4)Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: active-management burden-of-proof circuit-split erisa erisa-fiduciary erisa-fiduciary-duty fiduciary-duty index-funds investment-options loss-causation
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an ERISA plaintiff bears the burden of proving loss causation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A fiduciary of an ERISA plan is personally liable for “losses to the plan resulting from” a breach of fiduciary duty. 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a). Fiduciaries determine what investment options an ERISA retirement plan will offer to participants. Options may include “actively managed” funds, which seek a higher return than the market through the direction of an investment adviser, and/or passively managed “index” funds, which seek to duplicate the holdings of an established market index such as the S&P 500. The questions presented are as follows: 1. Whether an ERISA plaintiff bears the burden of proving that “losses to the plan result[ed] from” a fiduciary breach, as the Second, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have held, or whether ERISA defendants bear the burden of disproving loss causation, as the First Circuit concluded, joining the Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Circuits. 2. Whether, as the First Circuit concluded, showing that particular investment options did not perform as well as a set of index funds, selected by the plaintiffs with the benefit of hindsight, suffices as a matter of law to establish “losses to the plan.” i

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-10
Supplemental brief of petitioners Putnam Investments, LLC, et al. filed.
2019-11-27
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2019-04-22
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2019-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-04-01
Reply of petitioners Putnam Investments, LLC, et al. filed.
2019-03-14
Brief of respondents John Brotherston, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-02-15
Brief amicus curiae of Investment Company Institute filed.
2019-02-15
Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
2019-02-15
Brief amicus curiae of The American Council of Life Insurers filed.
2019-01-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 15, 2019.
2019-01-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 15, 2019 to March 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al.
Shay DvoretzkyJones Day, Amicus
Shay DvoretzkyJones Day, Amicus
Investment Company Institute
Mark Andrew PerryGibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Amicus
Mark Andrew PerryGibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Amicus
John Brotherston, et al.
James H. KasterNichols Kaster, PLLP, Respondent
James H. KasterNichols Kaster, PLLP, Respondent
Putnam Investments, LLC, et al.
William McGinley JayGoodwin Procter, LLP, Petitioner
William McGinley JayGoodwin Procter, LLP, Petitioner
The American Council of Life Insurers
Nicole A. SaharskyMayer Brown LLP, Amicus
Nicole A. SaharskyMayer Brown LLP, Amicus
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Amicus
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Amicus