Do State actors possess an inherent responsibility to protect a prisoner's right of access to process against unlawful interference?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Do State actors possess an inherent responsibility to protect a prisoner's right of access to process against unlawful interference? II. Should the Comer v. Peake doctrine be considered to apply to State appellate processes? TIL. Should the Mailbox Rule be considered.:ito apply to State appellate processes? IV... Should the Indiana Supreme Court be required to substatively , construe Petitioner's Motion for Writ of Certiorari. , and accompanying appellate documents as an attempt to seek the Indiana Supreme Court's de novo review of the : lower court cases?