| 25A589 |
Humphrey Daniels, III v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2025-11-18 |
Application |
|
appellate-process fraud-on-the-court government-misconduct hazel-atlas-doctrine judicial-supervision structural-conflict |
Whether a government-induced structural conflict that was never disclosed to a tribunal constitutes fraud on the court requiring judicial supervisory … |
| 24A137 |
Shariff Butler, et al. v. Laurel Harry, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-08-06 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-process extension-of-time incarceration pro-se supreme-court-rule writ-of-certiorari |
Whether a pro se prisoner's request for an extension of time to file a petition for writ of certiorari should be granted due to unique incarceration c… |
| 23-7437 |
Overille Denton Thompson, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-05-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-process certificate-of-appealability due-process federal-procedure fifth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-discretion legal-precedent procedural-review sanctions standard-of-review |
Whether the Fifth Circuit failed to engage in the COA process |
| 23-7178 |
Shawn Titus v. Donald L. Schense |
Nebraska |
2024-04-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
7th-amendment appellate-process due-process equal-access expert-affidavit legal-malpractice seventh-amendment summary-judgment trial-by-jury |
Could the trial court deprive petitioner of his 7th Amendment right to a trial by granting summary judgment based solely upon the defendant-expert's c… |
| 23-6208 |
Pleadro J. Scott v. Miami Dade County, Florida, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-12-08 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
advocacy appellate-process appellate-review case-law civil-procedure court-procedure discretion due-process incomplete-record judicial-review legal-interpretation statutory-construction |
Whether the court of appeals erred in failing to exercise its discretion to consider additional advocacy from a party, where the judgment was based on… |
| 23-5307 |
Curt Daniel Crowder v. Texas |
Texas |
2023-08-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-process appellate-review constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance remedy right-to-counsel right-to-present-witnesses trial-procedure trial-process |
When a citizen is deprived of the right to present witnesses in his defense, and effective assistance of counsel, in both the trial and appellate proc… |
| 22-6198 |
Darrel Thorn v. Racetrac Petroleum, Incorporated |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-12-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts appellate-procedure appellate-process civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process judicial-leniency meaningful-opportunity pro-se pro-se-litigation standing |
Whether the procedural treatment currently afforded to pro-se litigants by federal courts comports with due process or whether more leniency is requir… |
| 22-5659 |
Donovan Moenell Williams v. North Carolina, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-09-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law appellate-process case-jurisdiction civil-rights court-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-filing scotus-petition standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the court's interpretation of the statutory provision is correct |
| 21-5860 |
Antonio Franklin v. Tim Shoop, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-10-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-process cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection final-judgment-rule fourteenth-amendment ineffective-counsel judicial-dereliction |
Whether the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendments protect inmates from an allegedly faulty appellate process due to ineffective counsel |
| 20-6530 |
Jamel Mobley v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-12-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-preservation appellate-process constitutional-ineffectiveness fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel new-trial-standard right-to-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-counsel |
Whether trial counsel can be constitutionally ineffective under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) for failing to preserve an issue for pur… |
| 19-7611 |
D'Marlo Levonne Faulk Johnson v. North Carolina |
North Carolina |
2020-02-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
6th-amendment appeal-process appellate-process constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel notice-of-appeal post-conviction right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Whether the 6th Amendment right to counsel extends to the appellate process and requires the effective assistance of counsel when petitioner's attorne… |
| 19-6259 |
Keino S. Chrichlow v. Dana Metzger, Warden, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-10-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
abandonment-of-counsel appellate-procedure appellate-process civil-rights constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel direct-appeal due-process habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel standing |
whether-an-indigent-defendant-is-entitled-to-equitable-toll-where-he-was-denied-the-right-to-challenge-his-sentence-and-convictions-by-way-of-direct-a… |
| 18-9334 |
In Re Phillip S. Grigalanz |
|
2019-05-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts access-to-process appellate-process civil-rights due-process prisoner-rights state-action state-actors unlawful-interference writ-of-certiorari |
Do State actors possess an inherent responsibility to protect a prisoner's right of access to process against unlawful interference? |
| 18-45 |
David Louis Whitehead v. Netflix, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-07-09 |
Denied |
|
appellate-process civil-procedure-subpoena civil-rights due-process federal-judge judicial-bias judicial-discretion marbury-v-madison pecuniary-interest standing subpoena subpoena-violation |
Whether Petitioner's case relating to Federal Judge violating the subpoena issue allows him to by-pass the appellate process to petition the Supreme C… |