No. 19-6259
Keino S. Chrichlow v. Dana Metzger, Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: abandonment-of-counsel appellate-procedure appellate-process civil-rights constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel direct-appeal due-process habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-12-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-an-indigent-defendant-is-entitled-to-equitable-toll-where-he-was-denied-the-right-to-challenge-his-sentence-and-convictions-by-way-of-direct-appeal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . whether or not an indigent defendant {5 entitled to equitable Toll NA, Where he Was in Fact denied the riaht to Challenge hts Sentence and Convictions bY Wad oF bivect Appeal, based on The Abandonment oF his Court appointed Counsel? de Does an indigent defendant recewe the united States Constitutional Quarantee of Due Process, Where he 15 denied Counsel and evidentiary hearings during The appetlate process, aS a SCheme, iw State Court, Federal district Court, and the Federa\ Court oF Appeals ? tis
Docket Entries
2019-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)
2019-08-07
Application (19A152) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 6, 2019.
2019-07-29
Application (19A152) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 7, 2019 to October 6, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.