Donovan Moenell Williams v. North Carolina, et al.
Whether the court's interpretation of the statutory provision is correct
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ane dah + vereaure iy pu pager 1 efbede 208 preted tien Wee ayy ag AL se2ates Piwevcerateh Perres. A osOry serue shal perpen he; vee en Pow Hrs mts U iwLerpretatoo DQ. RenpacloentSuperine thay cald weve ve vatUly 02 ; Byer as ore " 3, Does the ttn § comin senue Packs decid leoa( jofgon ¢ moduarspows Like is the Coy phy Pak Swgly gee Anat Lt poed elpst is all aoord techwicatabes onl SAE ae we Thoth {ne Supreime Gout tui (| a me WD Vonestly dont comprelicad \now aay doer Cowl didike usr lendle (ne goblem i The IF Plre, Lilte cucrpmietleti here wth Wc \pors whats Sars OW, *& soldi be This comphiated ® get rede 5 | |