No. 22-5659

Donovan Moenell Williams v. North Carolina, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-process case-jurisdiction civil-rights court-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-filing scotus-petition standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court's interpretation of the statutory provision is correct

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ane dah + vereaure iy pu pager 1 efbede 208 preted tien Wee ayy ag AL se2ates Piwevcerateh Perres. A osOry serue shal perpen he; vee en Pow Hrs mts U iwLerpretatoo DQ. RenpacloentSuperine thay cald weve ve vatUly 02 ; Byer as ore " 3, Does the ttn § comin senue Packs decid leoa( jofgon ¢ moduarspows Like is the Coy phy Pak Swgly gee Anat Lt poed elpst is all aoord techwicatabes onl SAE ae we Thoth {ne Supreime Gout tui (| a me WD Vonestly dont comprelicad \now aay doer Cowl didike usr lendle (ne goblem i The IF Plre, Lilte cucrpmietleti here wth Wc \pors whats Sars OW, *& soldi be This comphiated ® get rede 5 | |

Docket Entries

2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2022)

Attorneys

Donovan Moenell Williams
Donovan Moenell Williams — Petitioner
Donovan Moenell Williams — Petitioner