No. 18-94
Augusta Thomas, Jr. v. Delmarva Power & Light Company
Response Waived
Tags: burden-shifting civil-rights due-process employment employment-discrimination employment-law mixed-motive race-discrimination summary-judgment title-vii
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework should be applied at the summary judgment stage of a mixed-motive Title VII race discrimination case
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework should be applied at the summary judgment stage of a mixed-motive Title VII race discrimination case. 2. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred when it required Thomas to either satisfy the McDonnell Douglas framework or meet a “demanding standard” under a mixed-motive framework to overcome summary judgment in favor of DPL.
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent Delmarva Power & Light Company to respond filed.
2018-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)
Attorneys
Augusta Thomas, Jr.
Delmarva Power & Light Company
Susanne Harris Carnell — Lorenger & Carnell, PLC, Respondent
Susanne Harris Carnell — Lorenger & Carnell, PLC, Respondent