Where the federal courts below decided for themselves every triable fact issue crucial to petitioner's workplace discrimination and retaliation claims, refusing to give his proof the probative force it deserves on summary judgment, has he been denied the right to have a jury instead of judges decide whether her claims are compensable?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , 1. Where the federal courts below decided for themselves every triable fact issue crucial to petitioner’s workplace discrimination and retaliation claims, refusing to give his proof the probative force it deserves on summary judgment, has he been denied the right to have a jury instead of judges decide whether her . claims are compensable? 2. Should this Court provide renewed and much needed guidance to inferior federal courts so that summary judgment is no longer misused to weigh evidence, make credibility determinations, find facts and impose on this Title VII plaintiff a more onerous burden of proof than the process demands in order to deny his discrimination claims without a trial? i