No. 18-9523
Amnon Ami Levi v. United States
Tags: custodial-interrogation isolation language-abilities miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona neutral-location police-domination police-isolation totality-of-circumstances totality-of-the-circumstances voluntariness
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether factors of police domination and isolation can result in custodial interrogation within the meaning of Miranda v. Arizona
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW IL Whether factors of police domination and isolation can result in custodial interrogation within the meaning of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) before formal arrest, even though the interrogation occurs in familiar or neutral locations and the defendant is informed he can move around. II. Whether under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) and this Court’s “totality of the circumstances” standard, language abilities are a significant factor in the assessment of voluntariness. i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Amnon Levi
Margaret Yvonne Foldes — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Margaret Yvonne Foldes — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent