Keenan Brown v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA FirstAmendment
Did the Illinois Northern District Court erred its decision by not properly exercising Rule 56 Summary Judgment with all evidence being examined as a whole?
No question identified. : * iS SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES KEENAN BROWN Petitioner Vs. WAL-MART STORE’S INC’S Respondent On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to To the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit 1 QUESTION The Importance of the Constitution of the United States established America's national government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed certain basic rights for its citizens. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. To protect the rights of all U.S. citizens so that we all may have equal right. Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. Under the 42 U.S.C. § 1984 prohibit against LLC engaging in unlawful practices of employee adverse actions. LLC that engage in unlawful practices gives employer the rights to file suits against LLC for discrimination for race sex and basis matters under the jurisdiction. 1. Did the Illinois Northern District Court erred its decision by not properly exercising Rule 56 Summary Judgment with all evidence being examined as a whole? 2. Did the Seventh Circuit Court Appeals & Illinois Northern District Court erred it’s decision by not applying the Petitioner constitutional Civil Rights 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2 for unlawful employment practices ,42 U.S.C. §2000e-3 other employment practices 29 U.S.C. §791(a)-(b) prohibits against age,42 U.S.C. §12203 prohibits against retaliations and coercion 42 U.S.C. §12117, -21233 & 12188 (a) (b)Bill of Rights First Amendment & Whistle Blower Act of 1984 Discrimination Act 3. Did the Illinois Northern District Court & Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred it’s a decision without truly understanding of the evidence of undisputed facts in this case? 2