No. 18-9687

Candelario Lucio-Garza v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: attempted-crime attempted-reentry circuit-conflict criminal-law federal-jurisdiction immigration mens-rea specific-intent united-states-v-resendiz-ponce
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the crime of attempted illegal reentry incorporate the common-law mens rea of a specific intent to commit the completed offense?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does the crime of attempted illegal reentry incorporate the common-law mens rea of a specific intent to commit the completed offense? i

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-22
Reply of petitioner Candelario Lucio-Garza filed.
2019-10-16
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-09-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 16, 2019.
2019-09-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 16, 2019 to October 16, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 16, 2019 to September 16, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 16, 2019.
2019-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 16, 2019.
2019-07-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 17, 2019 to August 16, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Candelario Lucio-Garza
Michael Lance HermanFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Michael Lance HermanFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent