No. 18-9729
Odell Lameche Overby v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-3553 3553(c) appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court-obligation due-process judicial-discretion judicial-reasoning nonfrivolous-arguments sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court fulfilled its obligation under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) to announce the reasons for its sentencing decision
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the district court fulfilled its obligation under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) to announce the reasons for its sentencing decision where the court never addressed Petitioner’s nonfrivolous arguments in favor of a lower sentence.
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-20
Supplemental brief of petitioner Odell Lameche Overby filed. (Distributed)
2019-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Odell Lameche Overby
Jennifer C. Leisten — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent