| 23-7565 |
Juan Aguiera-Guzman v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-05-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing judicial-reasoning mitigation-arguments plain-error sentencing sentencing-discretion silent-record |
Whether the holding in Molina-Martinez applies to sentencing-errors, such as the clear Rule 32 violation here |
| 23-57 |
Julio Yee Cabrera, et al. v. Enrique Lozano, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-21 |
Denied |
|
appellate-discretion attorney-fees circuit-court-procedure civil-procedure due-process judicial-discretion judicial-reasoning judicial-transparency legal-reasoning procedural-review standing transparency |
Whether a U.S. Court of Appeals panel has unfettered discretion in every matter to withhold all indication of its reasons for ruling |
| 22-6399 |
Kerry Simpson v. Tom Watson, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-12-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure dna-evidence due-process judicial-reasoning legal-standard manifest-weight prejudice prejudice-standard standard-of-review |
Did the Federal Appellate Court Apply the Correct Standard in the Determination of Prejudice? |
| 22-5317 |
Dora L. Adkins v. Merrifield Hotel Associates, LP |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-08-09 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fourth-circuit-review judicial-reasoning standard-of-review standing summary-affirmance unpublished-opinion |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Erred in the Order, Dated, July 28, 2022 |
| 21-8015 |
Jeffrey Kinzle v. Eric Jackson |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-06-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure court-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-reasoning state-courts statutory-interpretation supreme-court |
Whether a federal court may 'look through' to review the decision of an inferior court when the high court offers additional reasoning |
| 21-7357 |
Joel Castro-Lopez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-03-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing discretion district-court-discretion guidelines judicial-reasoning legal-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review |
Whether a district court errs should reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range? |
| 21-963 |
Neil McNaughton v. Eric Adams, Mayor of the City of New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2022-01-04 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process erickson-precedent federal-courts federal-procedure judicial-accountability judicial-reasoning pleadings pro-se-pleading standing twombly twombly-plausibility |
Does the persistent misapplication of the Twombly plausibility test by Federal judges invariably lead to a violation of this Court's mandate in Ericks… |
| 19-1129 |
Charles T. Fote v. Andrei Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2020-03-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure certiorari-petition civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process judicial-opinion judicial-reasoning judicial-review legal-reasoning rehearing supervisory-authority written-opinion |
Whether a court of appeals must provide an opinion explaining its reasoning in an appeal that involves a complex and unsettled area of the law and in … |
| 19-7257 |
Dillon Mvuri v. American Airlines, Inc. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-01-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-reasoning pro-se summary-judgement summary-judgment |
Where the district court issues a summary judgement without giving reasons on the record contrary to Rule 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and t… |
| 19-6161 |
John Connolly v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-10-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
adjudication civil-procedure due-process federal-claim judicial-reasoning procedural-requirements reasons state-court |
Whether the due process clause requires a state court adjudicating a federal claim to set forth the reasons for its adjudication? |
| 18-9729 |
Odell Lameche Overby v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-06-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553 3553(c) appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court-obligation due-process judicial-discretion judicial-reasoning nonfrivolous-arguments sentencing sentencing-guidelines |
Whether the district court fulfilled its obligation under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) to announce the reasons for its sentencing decision |
| 18-8749 |
Marvin Earl Blanks, Jr. v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553 appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion judicial-reasoning sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether the district court fulfilled its obligation under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) to announce the reasons for its sentencing decision |
| 18-8458 |
Oniel Winston Scarlett v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-03-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
11th-circuit appellate-review buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability certificate-of-appealability-coa due-process eleventh-circuit ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-reasoning merits-analysis merits-review reasonable-jurist sentencing |
Should the Eleventh Circuit provide a sufficient explanation of its order denying a COA in order that a reasonable jurist could ensue its reasoning di… |